Shared decision making or paternalism in nursing consultations? A qualitative study of primary care asthma nurses' views on sharing decisions with patients regarding inhaler device selection.

BACKGROUND: Although patients with asthma would like more involvement in the decision-making process, and UK government policy concerning chronic conditions supports shared decision making, it is not widely used in practice. OBJECTIVE: To investigate how nurses approach decision making in relation to inhaler choice and long-term inhaler use within a routine asthma consultation and to better understand the barriers and facilitators to shared decision making in practice. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with post-registration, qualified nurses who routinely undertook asthma consultations and were registered on a respiratory course. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using the Framework approach. RESULTS: Twenty participants were interviewed. Despite holding positive views about shared decision making, limited shared decision making was reported. Opportunities for patients to share decisions were only offered in relation to inhaler device, which were based on the nurse's pre-selected recommendations. Giving patients this 'choice' was seen as key to improving adherence. DISCUSSION: There is a discrepancy between nurses' understanding of shared decision making and the depictions of shared decision making presented in the academic literature and NHS policy. In this study, shared decision making was used as a tool to support the nurses' agenda, rather than as a natural expression of equality between the nurse and patient. CONCLUSION: There is a misalignment between the goals of practice nurses and the rhetoric regarding patient empowerment. Shared decision making may therefore only be embraced if it improves patient outcomes. This study indicates attitudinal shifts and improvements in knowledge of 'shared decision-making' are needed if policy dictates are to be realised.

Assessment of psychosocial problems in primary care COPD patients.

The emphasis placed on assessing psychosocial needs in nurse-led practice based consultations for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has not been reported. We investigated the frequency with which nurses performed a range of tasks, and explored if the types of tasks performed were related to levels of training or the setting of clinical consultations. Participants were lead COPD nurses based at 500 randomly selected UK general practices. Respondents completed a questionnaire between February and June 2006. The frequency with which key task were performed - never, sometimes, often or always - was recorded. Follow-up consultations were conducted by 349 of the 368 nurses who responded (74% response rate). Of these, 51% (95% confidence interval (CI):45-56%) reported often or always assessing psychosocial needs, in comparison to 98% (97-99%) who reported often or always checking inhaler technique and 86% (82-89%) who often or always recorded spirometry values. Frequent assessment of psychosocial needs was associated with postregistration COPD education and consultations taking place in designated respiratory clinics. Nurses focus on objective tasks, possibly to the detriment of assessing psychosocial needs. To raise the profile of these aspects of care: updates of the COPD section of the GMS contract should encompass the assessment of patient's psychosocial status and potential impact of this on quality of life; and appropriate education should be provided.

Assessment of key influences on asthma inhaler device selection.

AIM: To identify factors that influenced trained asthma practice nurses' inhaler device selection and the relative importance they placed on these factors in clinical practice. METHOD: Questionnaires were sent to 1,500 randomly selected, trained asthma nurses working in primary care. A second, open-ended questionnaire was sent to 300 of these nurses. RESULTS: The response rate was 38% (573) for the first questionnaire and 21% (64) for the second questionnaire. Patient-related factors had the greatest influence on device selection. Other important factors were ease of inhaler use, the patient's lifestyle and inspiratory flow. Less important considerations were device availability, the size, shape and colour of the inhaler and recommendations from others. CONCLUSION: Many factors influence device selection. Nurses considered some of the factors identified as important when selecting a device, but not others. Nurses should be aware of potential influences on device selection and should consider their professional accountability in all patient interactions.

National survey on the roles and training of primary care respiratory nurses in the UK in 2006: are we making progress?

OBJECTIVES: To describe nurse-led UK general practice asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) care, and the training undertaken to support it. METHODS: Questionnaires were sent to 500 randomly-selected UK asthma and COPD practice nurses. RESULTS: 382 nurses (76%) completed the practice characteristics section, 389 (78%) described their asthma roles and training, and 368 (74%) described their COPD roles and training. 96 practices (25%; 95%CI 21-29%) ran designated asthma clinics, 87 (23%; 95%CI 19- 27%) ran designated COPD clinics, and 170 (45%; 95%CI 40-49%) did not run designated respiratory clinics. Of the 255 nurses with an advanced asthma role, 51 (20%; 95%CI 15-25%) did not have accredited asthma training. Of the 215 nurses with an advanced COPD role, 111 (52%; 95%CI 45-58%) did not have accredited COPD training. CONCLUSION: Patients are increasingly being seen outside of designated asthma or COPD clinics, often by nurses with an advanced role. It is important that nurses have the training to fulfil this role.